MIST

Magnetosphere, Ionosphere and Solar-Terrestrial

Latest news

2026 MIST Council Election Results

It is our pleasure to announce the results of the latest MIST Council Election.

  • Samuel Wharton (University of Leicester) is elected for a 3 year term as a MIST Councillor
  • Jewel Abbey Relampagos (Lancaster University) is elected for a 1 year term as the MIST Student Representative

In addition, due to concerns from the community regarding the ongoing UKRI/STFC funding situation, MIST Council have also decided to charter Mark Lester (University of Leicester) as an additional councillor to inform and steer the council in matters related to this specific brief, as set out in Article 4.5 of the MIST Charter.

We would like to congratulate everyone on their new roles. The full composition of Council can be found on the MIST website (https://www.mist.ac.uk/community/mist-council). We would like to thank all the candidates for putting themselves forward and everyone who took part in the voting. We received votes from 132 people which represents a turnout of 21.5% of people registered to receive the MIST emailing list.

Finally, MIST Council would like to extend their thanks and gratitude to our outgoing members: Fiona Ball and Georgios Nicolaou. We would also like to say a special thank you to Andy Smith who was co-opted to be on MIST council while Rosie Johnson was on maternity leave, thank you for all of your hard work.

Open Letter Ready For Signatories

Protect MIST Science! Sign the MIST Community Open Letter on the STFC funding cuts!

https://sites.google.com/view/uk-mist-community-open-letter

 

Statement from MIST Council regarding the STFC Funding Situation

Statement from MIST Council regarding the STFC Funding Situation

MIST Council is deeply concerned by the ongoing STFC funding uncertainty and its impact on our community and beyond.

The current combination of prospective delayed and reduced funding, together with already volatile financial situations at universities across the UK, is placing significant strain on research groups. In some cases, institutions may be unable to support researchers through gaps between projects, increasing precarity across the community and adding significant pressure on early-career researchers.

We are concerned that continued uncertainty risks accelerating a brain drain from the UK, as skilled researchers reconsider their future in a system offering limited stability. The loss of expertise at any career stage would have lasting consequences for UK space science.

 

What is going on?

For those that are unaware of the situation, it is complex and evolving. We suggest the following sources to get up to speed on the current developments.

https://www.sciencecampaign.org.uk/analysis-and-publications/detail/what-is-happening-with-ukri-funding-and-the-stfc-cuts/

https://ras.ac.uk/news-and-press/news/proposed-budget-cuts-catastrophe-uk-astronomy

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2514481-physicists-warn-of-catastrophic-impact-from-uk-science-cuts/

 

What are we doing about it?

Behind the scenes, MIST Council is actively engaging with relevant parties to understand the scale of the challenge and to identify constructive ways forward.

  • We are seeking seasoned members of the community to join MIST Council on a task force to help develop options and represent the needs of our community. If you would like to be involved, please reach out to us via the MIST Council email (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.) by the end of this week (13th February 2026).
  • In addition to the task force, we want to provide an open forum for discussion and collective input among all members of the wider MIST community. We are exploring options and will be in touch as soon as possible with further details.
  • We believe in working together in the face of the current challenges and we are collaborating with UKSP and others to strive for a fair and positive outcome for all. We are reaching out to members of the SSAP (Solar System Advisory Panel) to explore the hosting of a community town hall meeting, like the one already being organised by the AAP (Astronomy Advisory Panel), to provide an open forum for discussion and collective input.

 

What can you do to help?

There are several open letters representing people in various career stages that have been made available to sign. We encourage you to read the relevant letter(s) and to sign them if you support them:

The Royal Astronomical Society are also urging Fellows to lobby their MPs against the cuts, and have included a template letter that can be used to do so:
https://ras.ac.uk/news-and-press/news/ras-fellows-urged-lobby-against-unprecedented-cuts

 

MIST Council will continue to advocate for transparency, stability, and funding structures that recognise both the long-term nature of our science and the people who deliver it.
We thank you for your continued support in this period of uncertainty.

 

Please contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. if you have further suggestions.
MIST Council

Announcement of New MIST Council 2025

We are very pleased to announce the following members of the community have been elected to MIST Council:

  • Gemma Bower (University of Leicester), MIST Councillor
  • Tom Elsden (University of St Andrews), MIST Councillor
  • Cameron Patterson (Lancaster University), MIST Councillor
  • Fiona Ball (University of Southampton), Student Representative

They will begin their terms in July 2025.

We thank outgoing MIST Council members: Maria Walach, Chiara Lazzeri and Emma Woodfield. Andy Smith will remain on council a little longer as a co-opted member to cover Rosie Johnson's maternity leave.

The current composition of Council can be found on our website (https://www.mist.ac.uk/community/mist-council).

Announcement of New MIST Councillors.

We are very pleased to announce the following members of the community have been elected unopposed to MIST Council:

  • Rosie Johnson (Aberystwyth University), MIST Councillor
  • Matthew Brown (University of Birmingham), MIST Councillor
  • Chiara Lazzeri (MSSL, UCL), Student Representative

Rosie, Matthew, and Chiara will begin their terms in July. This will coincide with Jasmine Kaur Sandhu, Beatriz Sanchez-Cano, and Sophie Maguire outgoing as Councillors.

The current composition of Council can be found on our website, and this will be amended in July to reflect this announcement (https://www.mist.ac.uk/community/mist-council).

Nuggets of MIST science, summarising recent papers from the UK MIST community in a bitesize format.

If you would like to submit a nugget, please fill in the following form: https://forms.gle/DGNZiP7sA3e8U29ZA and we will arrange a slot for you in the schedule. Nuggets should be 100–300 words long and include a figure/animation. Please get in touch!
If you have any issues with the form, please contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. 

Predicting Swarm Equatorial Plasma Bubbles via Machine Learning and Shapley Values

By Sachin Reddy (UCL Mullard Space Science Laboratory)

In the nightside ionosphere, plumes of low-density plasma known as Equatorial Plasma Bubbles (EPBs) are prone to form. EPBs can disrupt GNSS signals which depend on quiet ionospheric conditions, but the day-to-day variability of bubbles has made predicting them a considerable challenge. In this study we present AI Prediction of EPBs (APE), a machine learning model that accurately predicts the Ionospheric Bubble Index (IBI) on Swarm. IBI identifies EPBs by correlating (R2) a simultaneous change in the current density and magnetic field.

APE is XGBoost regressor that is trained on data from 2014-2022. It performs well across all metrics, exhibiting a skill, association, and root mean squared error score of 0.96/1, 0.98/1 and 0.08/0 respectively. APE performs best post-sunset, in the American/Atlantic sector, around the equinoxes, and when solar activity is high. This is promising because EPBs are most likely to occur during these periods.

Shapley Value analysis reveals that F10.7 is the most important feature, whilst latitude is the least. Bespoke indices may be required to fully capture the effects of geomagnetic activity which is known to both enhance and suppress EPB formation. The Shapley analysis also reveals that low solar activity, active geomagnetic conditions, and the Earth-Sun perihelion all contribute to an increased EPB likelihood. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time this exact combination of features has been linked to bubble detection. This showcases the ability of Shapley values to enable new insights into EPB climatology and predictability.

Four predictions made by APE and the feature values that drove it. Positive values (right pointing arrows) increase EPB likelihood, whereas negative values (left pointing arrows) decrease likelihood. All predictions occur around the Earth-Sun perihelion and Kp > 2. The predicted value is f(x) and all are > 0.7, which means they are EPBs. This is the first time this unique combination has been linked to increased EPB occurrence, showcasing the ability of ML techniques to enable new scientific insight.

See full paper for details: Reddy, S. A., Forsyth, C., Aruliah, A., Smith, A., Bortnik, J., Aa, E., et al. (2023). Predicting swarm equatorial plasma bubbles via machine learning and Shapley values. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 128, e2022JA031183. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA031183

Global dynamical network of the spatially correlated Pc2 wave response for the 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm

By Shahbaz Chaudhry (University of Warwick)

Space weather poses a risk to infrastructure including satellites and power systems. A key challenge within space weather is predicting the magnetospheric response during storms. In order to understand the dynamics of geomagnetic storms, we can study Pc waves which are field line resonances along closed field lines in the inner magnetosphere. Recently, SuperMAG and Intermagnet have released new second resolution data which allows higher frequency Pc2 (T=5-10s) waves to be resolved and studied globally. Generation mechanisms for Pc2 waves (which we focus on in this paper) include ion-cyclotron resonance at equatorial regions of the magnetosphere.

To better understand geomagnetic storms, we for the first time build a Pc2 wave dynamical network using the full set of 100+ ground-based magnetometer stations. A network graphs the connections (edges) between entities (nodes). An example includes airline networks, where the nodes are airports and edges are flight paths. Here we build dynamical networks where nodes and edges are time varying. Network edges will be built upon the cross-correlation between Pc2 waves observed magnetic field at pairs of ground-based magnetometer stations.

Our first results are a study of the 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm for an 8 hour time window around onset. Using this storm we have identified network parameters and have shown that these track the distinct phases of the storm in terms of spatial coherence of Pc2 wave activity. We show that the network responds to distinct phase of the storm, including southward or northward IMF and does not just track the average Pc2 power. Using these network parameters we can perform statistical studies across many storms and quantitatively benchmark space weather models with observations. In addition, this analysis can be easily extended to other Pc bands which have different generation mechanisms within the magnetosphere.

Network snapshot at storm onset for the northern magnetic field component comprising 81 stations. Throughout panels (a)-(d), four groups of connections are shown, all connections (green), superimposed are connections spanning MLT<4 h (orange), north-south connections spanning MLT<4 h (purple), and pseudo-chains (blue). Panel (d) shows connections plotted in geomagnetic coordinates. Panels (a) and (b) show connections plotted in geographic coordinates and limited to the southern and northern hemispheres respectively. The global degree distribution for the given network snapshot is shown in (b) with colors corresponding to network edges in panels (a), (b), and (d).
Figure showing network snapshot at storm onset for the northern magnetic field component comprising 81 stations. Throughout panels (a)-(d), four groups of connections are shown, all connections (green), superimposed are connections spanning MLT<4 h (orange), north-south connections spanning MLT<4 h (purple), and pseudo-chains (blue). Panel (d) shows connections plotted in geomagnetic coordinates. Panels (a) and (b) show connections plotted in geographic coordinates and limited to the southern and northern hemispheres respectively. The global degree distribution for the given network snapshot is shown in (b) with colours corresponding to network edges in panels (a), (b), and (d).

 

See paper for full details: Chaudhry, S., Chapman, S. C., Gjerloev, J., & Beggan, C. D. (2023). Global dynamical network of the spatially correlated Pc2 wave response for the 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 128, e2022JA031175. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA031175

Formation and Motion of Horse Collar Aurora Events

By Gemma Bower (University of Leicester)

Horse collar aurora (HCA) are an auroral phenomena that occurs under northward IMF where the polar cap becomes teardrop shaped due to the poleward motion of the dusk and dawn sectors of the auroral oval. Their formation has been linked to prolonged periods of dual-lobe reconnection (DLR). This occurs when the same IMF magnetic field line reconnects in both the northern and southern hemisphere lobes when the IMF clock angle is small. This leads to the closure of magnetic flux at the dayside magnetopause. In order to further study the motion of HCA a list of HCA events previously identified in UV images captured by the Special Sensor Ultraviolet Spectrographic Imager (SSUSI) instrument on-board the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) spacecraft F16, F17 and F18 has been used. Events that have concurrent 630.0 nm all-sky camera (ASC) data from the Redline Geospace Observatory (REGO) Resolute Bay site are studied in more detail, making use of the higher cadence of the ASC images compared to DMSP/SSUSI. 11 HCA events are classified based on the IMF conditions at the end of the event. A southward turning of the IMF ends five events, two end with positive By dominated IMF and four with negative By dominance. The figure shows one of the studied events that ends with a southward turning of the IMF. Under positive (negative) By the arcs move duskward (dawnward) in the northern hemisphere with the opposite true in the southern hemisphere. Under a southward turning the arcs move equatorward. These results are in agreement with previously proposed models. Understanding the evolution of HCA will allow DLR to be studied in more detail.

Figure 1: One of the studied events. The top panels show the keograms of the ASC and the relevant interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) data for the event. The first row of the columns shows the DMSP/IDM flows with an inset showing the IMF clock angle at the time of the SSUSI image. The second row is the LBHs SSUSI image on a log scale. The third row is the SSUSI image centred on the Taloyoak ASC station with the available ASC images projected on top. The final rows are the ASC images with north located at the top of each image plotted on a log scale. The UT given is the time of the ASC image and the most poleward point of the DMSP pass.
Figure 1: One of the studied events. The top panels show the keograms of the ASC and the relevant interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) data for the event. The first row of the columns shows the DMSP/IDM flows with an inset showing the IMF clock angle at the time of the SSUSI image. The second row is the LBHs SSUSI image on a log scale. The third row is the SSUSI image centred on the Taloyoak ASC station with the available ASC images projected on top. The final rows are the ASC images with north located at the top of each image plotted on a log scale. The UT given is the time of the ASC image and the most poleward point of the DMSP pass.


Please see paper for full details: Bower, Bower, G. E., Milan, S. E., Paxton, L. J., Spanswick, E., & Hairston, M. R. (2023). Formation and motion of horse collar aurora events. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 128, e2022JA031105. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA031105

Will Space Weather Delay Your Train? – Modelling the Impact of Geomagnetically Induced Currents on Electrified Railway Signaling Systems in the United Kingdom

By Cameron Patterson (Lancaster University)

Railway signalling is one of the many ground-based systems that are susceptible to the impacts of space weather. A popular signalling system is the track circuit, where a line is split into smaller sections called ‘blocks’, each containing a power supply and a relay that sets the signal based on the level of current. Currents induced in the rails during geomagnetic events disrupt this balance, and have the potential to cause signalling misoperations, which can create delays and/or possibly be hazardous. Using recent theoretical work and parameters from industry standards documents, we have developed realistic models of two railway lines in the United Kingdom to study the impacts that geomagnetically induced currents have on signalling systems. In this study, we have focused on right side failures, which is when there are no trains occupying the blocks and green signals are turned red. Our results show that the susceptibility of a track circuit to induced currents is dependent on its length, orientation and position along the line. We found that the threshold electric field strength for a misoperation to occur is approximately what would arise during a storm expected to occur once every 30 years. Finally, we showed that with a 1 in 100 year extreme electric field, there would be a significant number of misoperations across the line.

 

Figure 1. The current through each of the track circuit relays between Glasgow to Edinburgh with (a) no geoelectric field applied, (b) at the threshold for misoperation, and (c) at the estimated electric field strength for a 1 in 100 year event. The green circles indicate the current of each relay, the red (solid) line shows the current value below which the track circuit would de-energize and display an incorrect signal, and the green (dashed) line shows the level that the current would need to rise above to re-energize if de-energized. An unfilled green circle means normal operation, and a filled red circle indicates a misoperation.

 

Please see the following paper for a more in depth look: Patterson, C. J., Wild, J. A., & Boteler, D. H. (2023). Modeling the impact of geomagnetically induced currents on electrified railway signaling systems in the United Kingdom. Space Weather, 21, e2022SW003385. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003385.

Extreme Event Statistics in Dst, SYM-H, and SMR Geomagnetic Indices

Aisling Bergin (University of Warwick)

Extreme space weather events are rare, and quantifying their likelihood relies upon long-term continuous observations. High-quality ground-based magnetometer observations underpin geomagnetic indices that monitor space weather and span multiple solar cycles. The Dst index ring-current monitor, derived from an hourly average over four low-latitude stations, is a benchmark for extreme space weather events, and has been extensively studied statistically. Space weather storms cause magnetic perturbation that can be localized in space and time. Geomagnetic ring current indices are available which use a larger number of magnetometers than Dst: SYM-H (derived from 6 stations) and SuperMAG SMR (derived from up to 120 stations).

In this paper we perform the first extreme value theory (EVT) analysis of SYM-H and SMR. EVT analysis reveals a divergence between the return level found for Dst, and those for SYM-H and SMR, that increases non-linearly with return period. For return periods below 10 years, hourly averaged SYM-H and SMR have return levels similar to Dst, but at return periods of 50 and 100 years, they respectively exceed that of Dst by about 10% and 15% (SYM-H) and about 7% and 12% (SMR). One minute resolution SYM-H and SMR return levels progressively exceed that of Dst; their 5, 10, 50, and 100 year return levels exceed that of Dst by about 10%, 12%, 20% and 25% respectively. Our results indicate that consideration should be given to the differences between the indices if selecting one to use as a benchmark in model validation or resilience planning for the wide range of space weather sensitive systems that underpin our society.


Figure 1. Comparison of event return levels across geomagnetic indices. Empirical estimates of the return levels for peak-over-threshold values are compared for (a) Dst (blue), hourly average SMR (orange), and hourly average SYM-H indices (pink), and (b) Dst (blue), 1-minute SMR (green), and 1-minute SYM-H indices (red). For each index, extreme value theory return level estimates (solid line) with 95% confidence intervals (shaded) are plotted.

 

Please see the paper for full details: Bergin, A., Chapman, S. C., Watkins, N. W., Moloney, N. R., & Gjerloev, J. W. (2023). Extreme event statistics in Dst, SYM-H, and SMR geomagnetic indices. Space Weather, 21, e2022SW003304. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003304