Magnetosphere, Ionosphere and Solar-Terrestrial

Latest news

2021 Astronomy Grants

The closing date for the 2021 Astronomy Grants Round is 4th March 2021. Submissions are accepted from now. The Astronomy Guidelines for Applicants have been revised and can be found via the links below (the PDF with the full guidance is available under the ‘who can apply’ section on both pages):

Applicants should ensure they have read the guidelines in detail and contact the office with any queries ahead of submission.

Key points or revisions from the 2020 guidelines have been briefly summarised below for information:

  • Page Limits – The page limit per project has been simplified and is no longer based on a requested FTE calculation.
  • Applicant/Project FTE – There has been a change to the upper limit for requested applicant FTE (25%, not including PI management time). The guidance for total FTE requests per project has also been updated and must be strictly adhered to.
  • Outreach Projects – Clarification on the page limit for outreach projects/outreach funding.
  • Pathways to Impact – UKRI removed the requirement to submit a pathways to impact plan in March 2020; however applicants should still consider impact as part of their case for support (see guidelines for further information).
  • Publications Table – Updates to the information required in the publications table.

New groups submitting their first consolidated grant proposal or those considering a consortium proposal are advised to inform the office ahead of submitting to the closing date. If you have any queries please contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

2020 Space Census

MIST members are invited to submit to the 2020 Space Census!

The 2020 Space Census is the first national survey of the UK space workforce. It is a 5-10 minute anonymous online demographic survey of individuals for anyone working in the UK space sector in any capacity. The results will be used to improve what it’s like to work in the sector, to tackle discrimination, and to make the sector more attractive to new recruits.

More information about the Census, along with answers to commonly asked questions, can be found here.

The UK Space Agency’s press release about the Census can be found here.

STFC Policy Internship Scheme now open

This year has proved the critical importance of science having a voice within Parliament. But how does scientific evidence come to the attention of policy makers? If you are a STFC-funded PhD student, you can experience this first-hand through our Policy Internship Scheme, which has just opened for applications for 2020/21. During these three-month placements, students are hosted either at the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST) or the Government Office for Science (GO Science).

POST is an independent office of the Houses of Parliament which provides impartial evidence reviews on topical scientific issues to MPs and Peers. Interns at POST will research, draft, edit and publish a briefing paper summarising the evidence base on an important or emerging scientific issue. GO Science works to ensure that Government policies and decisions are informed by the best scientific evidence and strategic long-term thinking. Placements at GO Science are likely to involve undertaking research, drafting briefing notes and background papers, and organising workshops and meetings.

The scheme offers a unique opportunity to experience the heart of UK policy making and to explore careers within the science-policy interface. The placements are fully funded and successful applicants will receive a three-month extension to their final PhD deadline.

For full information and to see case studies of previous interns, please see our website. The closing date is 10 September 2020 at 16.00.

Applied Sciences special issue: Dynamical processes in space plasmas


Applied Sciences is to publish a special issue on the topic of dynamical processes in space plasmas which is being guest edited by Georgious Nicolaou. Submissions are welcome until 31 March 2021, and submission instructions for authors can be found on the journal website. For general questions, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

MIST elections in 2020

The election for the next MIST councillors opens today, and will run until 23:59 on 31 July 2020. The candidates are Michaela Mooney, Matt Owens, and Jasmine Kaur Sandhu. 

If you are subscribed to this mailing list you should receive a bespoke link which will let you vote on the MIST website, which will be sent by This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. If you don’t receive this link, please check your junk folder! The candidates’ platforms are on the voting platform, and also reproduced below for your convenience. 

Michaela Mooney

I’m a final year PhD student at MSSL standing for MIST Council as a student representative. During my PhD, I’ve been actively engaged in the department as a Student Rep in the Staff Student Consultation Committee and in the Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Committee. I’m an active member of the MIST research community through proposals for RAS Discussion meetings and NAM sessions on geomagnetic activity. 

My main goals as a MIST Council representative would be to:

  • lobby funding bodies to reduce the impact of the pandemic on PhD students.
  • facilitate the organisation of virtual conferences and careers days to ensure that students continue to have opportunities to present research and access to careers information.
  • support good practises in equality, diversity and inclusion within the MIST community.

My key priority would be to limit the impact of the pandemic on students and ensure equality of opportunities.

Matt Owens

Now, more than ever, it’s vital our community address its diversity problems. If anyone is standing for MIST council from an underrepresented demographic, I’d encourage you to vote for them; MIST needs their experience and insight. If not, I’ll seek to ensure MIST council continues to promote equality of opportunity and diversity in science.

MIST’s primary role is to represent our solar-terrestrial science within the wider discipline. I’m predominantly a heliospheric scientist, but keep a toe in the solar physics community. E.g., I’ve served in editorial capacities for both JGR and Solar Physics, and have a good deal of experience with both NERC and STFC funding. As such, I’d hope to see MIST working closely with UKSP, as we have a lot of common interest. I am also keen that the MIST community coordinate to make the most of the industrial and operational forecasting opportunities that are open to it. Finally, I’m a very recent convert to open science. I would seek to increase the prevalence of research code publication and use of community tools within our field, for reasons of both efficiency and reproducibility.

Jasmine Kaur Sandhu

I am a post-doctoral research associate at the Mullard Space Science Laboratory, UCL, with a research focus on inner magnetospheric physics. During my time as a Council member I have led a number of initiatives, primarily the MIST Student’s Corner, the MIST Nugget Series, and the MIST online seminar series. If elected, I will continue to focus on supporting early career researchers in ways that promote diversity of both science and the scientists within our community. This will include developing a set of up-to-date, comprehensive, and informative resources on funding opportunities available to early career researchers for travel funding and fellowships. This will be supported by a mentor-like scheme for assistance and guidance on applications.

My experience of attending the Geospace Environment Modelling (GEM) 2018 workshop

by Harneet Sangha

Harneet Sangha is a second year PhD student at the University of Leicester. Harneet researches the structure and variability of field aligned current systems in Earth’s magnetosphere. In this blog post, Harneet talks about attending the 2018 GEM (Geospace Environment Modelling) workshop in Sante Fe.

What is GEM?

The GEM workshop showcases current research in investigating the Earth’s magnetosphere and how it is coupled to the ionosphere, atmosphere and the solar wind. There are a handful of research areas (Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interactions, the Inner Magnetosphere, Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling, Global System Modelling, and the Magnetotail and Plasmasheet), all of which have a number of their own smaller focus groups during the workshop. These focus groups change every few years, and new focus groups can be proposed by the community. GEM is funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and is a subsection of the NSF Geosciences Division.

I attended the GEM 2018 workshop, which ran from 17 June - 23 June 2018. I actually ended up going to America a few days early, and stayed in America for an extra week afterwards for a little holiday.

How did I fund the trip? 

I received funding from GEM, specifically the NSF, which paid for the accommodation and all internal travel to and from the conference. To receive this funding I applied to GEM directly, and had to send a statement of purpose to explain my research goals, how GEM will help me to pursue these goals, and how I can contribute to GEM (I contributed by presenting my work both orally and with a poster. I also signed up to do a student tutorial and although I didn’t get chosen for the tutorials, I was placed in reserve). GEM required me to write a follow-up report, explaining the benefits of attending, and what I gained from the whole experience. In addition to the GEM grant, I received money from the Royal Astronomical Society (RAS), which funded the flights to America, as well as food costs. I also had to provide a follow up report of the experience for RAS too.

The more things (a talk, poster, tutorials etc.) you sign up for, the more likely you are to receive funding from GEM. So apply for anything you can! You may not get everything, but the fact that you have signed up for them means you can be a reserve in case other students are unable to actually do them in the end (e.g. the student day tutorials). Also, if you do get to do everything, the experiences will be great!

A day in Sante Fe

The whole workshop was based in the Eldorado Hotel that the majority of us were staying in, which was really convenient! All the different focus group sessions were in different conference rooms along the same corridor, making it quick and easy to jump between the sessions, and find one that you were interested in.

The beautiful view from the rooftop of the Eldorado Hotel, where the GEM icebreaker event was held.

In the mornings, the sessions started at 08:30 and typically ran until 17:00, interspersed with coffee breaks and a lunch break. The talks were 10 minutes long with a couple of minutes for questions. On Tuesday and Thursday, there were poster sessions, which took place between 17:00 - 21:00. 

I went to a lot of sessions throughout the whole week and would always try to pick the ones that were most relevant to me. If there wasn’t one at a specific time I would either go to an interesting, semi-unrelated session, or go exploring the area around the hotel. I made notes on all the talks, and anything that may have helped my understanding for my own work. I also brought back a list of papers that I wanted to read, either out of interest or to further my knowledge. I saw a lot of interesting talks, especially as there was some work that I had no idea about, so it was very fascinating to see. The most useful session that I went to (and also presented in) was the Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions sessions, these talks ranged from modelling the behaviour of energetic particles in the inner magnetosphere, to studying chorus wave activity during storms. I also found sitting in on the panel discussions were very interesting, these would take place in the last session (usually of 3) of the focus groups, and the focus group leaders would discuss (along with the audience) the topics within the research area that need to be explored further. For example, the relationship between the ionosphere-atmosphere system during storm time is currently not well-known, neither are interhemispheric asymmetries in a lot of areas, including field-aligned currents and sub-auroral polarization streams (both related to my work).

The workshop was very sociable! At lunchtimes we would head to local restaurants in groups to eat out. I always tried to go to different places to try all the local cuisine, and it was easily done. There are more than enough different places to eat for the whole week. In the evenings, we would all go out to get some dinner, have some drinks, and socialise. On the Wednesday we had the conference dinner, which was held in the hotel. 

My first international conference!

This was my first international conference, as well as my first poster presentation. Before I even got there I had learned what made a good poster, and created one that I thought would have a chance of winning the student poster competition that I would be entering. By actually taking part in the poster competition, the anonymous judges provided me with some really useful suggestions to improve my future poster presentations, so I did learn a lot from the experience. Also, from presenting my work both orally and in a poster, I got a huge amount of good feedback, including a lot of different directions I can go in with my future projects. I brought these ideas back and we now have a long list of possible avenues for my research to go down. Both my poster and my presentation had the same title of “Field-Aligned Current Structure of Sub-Auroral Polarization Streams”, and I had given them both the same theme. This meant that those who had seen my presentation on the Tuesday morning, would be more likely to remember my work that Tuesday evening during the poster session, and could come up to me to discuss my work.

A photo from my oral presentation on the Tuesday morning.

GEM was a great opportunity for me to meet lots of international PhD students and researchers within the same field as me. Due to the layout of the GEM programme, the first full day (Sunday) was filled with student tutorials, where the PhD students would present some basic theory on different topics. This meant that we all had the same basic understanding as each other before the workshop began the next day. On this day, there were only students present, which meant that we got to know who all the students were straight away and got to chat with them before the main programme started. This happens every year and it’s a great way to meet everyone. We had an icebreaker during one of the breaks, which also really helped with introductions.

The conference was in Santa Fe, New Mexico. The area around the hotel was really lovely, a lot of mountains in the distances. It was really hot there too! The food was really great, and the shops were filled with beautiful handmade ornaments and jewellery, as well as a lot of pretty stones and gems in a few of the shops. I really enjoyed looking around all the shops! There is also the Georgia O’Keefe Museum nearby to the hotel which a few of us went to look around one day during a break.

One of the shop displays showing the vibrant items for sale.

Would I go to GEM again?

I would highly recommend attending this workshop. I found it had a really nice atmosphere which was friendly and more on the informal side (like MIST). It was a lot larger than MIST conferences that I have attended, but it was nice to get to meet so many new people at once and present my work to a large international audience for the first time.

I would definitely go again! I made a lot of good friends from this trip, who I have still kept in contact with and will hopefully see at other conferences in the future (even if I don’t return to GEM).

By talking to researchers throughout the week and talking about my work, I have new ideas and directions to go with my work. I have also promoted my work and my name. A lot of people who were interested in my work have said they will look out for my future papers, and a few have sent me emails with potentially relevant papers which has been really helpful for my work. And I am also about to email a few more people who I had met there to help me with my work!


If you have any more questions about Harneet’s experience at GEM then you can This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Some useful links:

Click here for information about the 2019 workshop.

Details on past/future GEM workshops are available here. This page also includes information on subscribing to the email newsletters. To join the student mailing list, you can This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. to be added to the GEM Students mailing list.